How do we motivate teachers to better understand curriculum guides?

I confess when I started teaching, even in math, if I had a book I based most of my curriculum on the book. The individual lessons were often modified, but I allowed the book publisher to dictate most of what was taught. During my first year of teaching it even dictated the order in which I taught.

During my second year I was actually given a curriculum book for Science, but I didn’t have the resources to follow it so I ignored it.

In my third year of teaching I picked and choose what chapters/lessons to teach from my textbook. I would add in self-created unit and lessons. I still had no idea what anyone else in my district actually taught in their classrooms.

My 5th and 6th year I moved to a middle school and taught from the Connected Math curriculum. I loved these books, because it was like teaching Science in math. The “experiments” were sometimes hokey or contrived, but in the end they did “show” math instead of telling.

My second year there I was asked to align the books to the state standards. I was asked to choose what parts of the books were essential to meeting state standards and what if any extra we had to add. Connected Math was designed to meet state standards in most states so I didn’t add anything. I did emphasis some areas over others. Some people questioned me, but in the end I was right.

The rub here is after 6 years of teaching, and one year of aligning curriculum I still haven’t really read a curriculum guide. I’ve discussed how I can integrate subjects with other teachers. As an elementary teacher I did integrate subjects all the time. But at the end of the day I never really got down to the brass tacks of planning what I was doing for the entire year.

For the first time I sat down and read carefully through all the curriculum materials in our district. It occurs to me that if most teachers are like me they probably skipped over reading the support materials that came with textbook.

Skipping the support material when I first taught Connected Math didn’t bother me because it is almost exactly what I would have written if I were an expert on curriculum. All student-centeredness and cooperative groups, constructing concepts, and multiple representations. In short it is a nice out of the box “discovery” based math curriculum. I think we could do a lot worse than starting with the first book and working straight through to the last book.

On the other hand I think many teachers dislike the curriculum simply because they don’t understand it. Without spending the time to learn the philosophy behind the text I think it might look a bit disconnected and random. Worst of all students just don’t seem to learn things.

I think, I hope, that if teachers got together and discussed subjects such as our philosophy of mathematics education, our purpose for teaching, or our ultimate goals; in the end we might have a better idea of what we actually want to teach. If we studied, not just wrote, our curriculum guide together we might come to a common vision of our curriculum in our district.

So how do we motivate teachers to better understand curriculum guides? The same way we build a district vision. We get together and find common ground and use that to guide our curriculum discussion. We don’t throw out the baby with the bath water, we mold our guide to fit our common vision. So what would you do?

Advertisements

About dendari

I finished my program at JHU in 2011. If you have enjoyed my writing here please follow me at philosophywithoutahome.com.
This entry was posted in Brendan Murphy, curriculum, education. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to How do we motivate teachers to better understand curriculum guides?

  1. Yes, I think you came to a good conclusion there about writing the curriculum guide together and sharing our philosophies. What does any self-respecting organization or group start with? A mission that states a philosophy. From that, everything flows. Nice post.

  2. I have always found the disconnect between the content being taught and the guides disturbing. If there is one practice that I firmly believe will connect educators back to the guides it is their supervisors and administrators. As instructional leaders, they should be introducing this text to their teachers. The inclusion of curriculum guide material should be mandatory in lesson plans and at that point, teachers and administrators should be held responsible for following the material.

    In my 16 years in education, I have never had one person explain the use and value of the curriculum guides. When I was moved from grades 7 & 8 language arts to teach first grade, this would have helped me tremendously. However, as is usually the case, I had my principal hand me my text books as she wished me a successful year.

    In my 16 years of teaching too often I have seen bad teaching practices permitted to continue for the lack of accountability from administrators. Administrators have a powerful role in the process of education. They have to ability to lead strongly by example in word and deed and their teachers can rise to the occasion when expectations are raised, much like our students.

  3. Pingback: Future of Curriculum | A Journey Into Leadership

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s